|
Hi Jirka,
Since I participated to NetCAT 7.1 all the bugs I report using NetBeans Exception Reporter are prefixed with [cat71]. Is there a way I can prevent it or it's supposed to be that way? Thanks, Paolo |
|
Hello Paolo,
yes, this was as designed. Tomasi, can you please tweak Exception Reporter not to auto prefix the reports? The privilege for NetCAT participants to file bugs directly to Bugzilla should be kept. Thanks! -Jirka Dne 13.2.2012 13:14, Paolo Scarabelli napsal(a): > Hi Jirka, > > Since I participated to NetCAT 7.1 all the bugs I report using NetBeans > Exception Reporter are prefixed with [cat71]. > > Is there a way I can prevent it or it's supposed to be that way? > > Thanks, > > Paolo |
|
Hello,
is this still valid? still getting prefixed issues? fix for this is already in repo, but I'm not currently sure if is present on currently running instance (we were migrating server to another machine in different location last week). T. On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > Hello Paolo, > > yes, this was as designed. > > Tomasi, can you please tweak Exception Reporter not to auto prefix the reports? The privilege for NetCAT participants to file bugs directly to Bugzilla should be kept. Thanks! > > -Jirka > > Dne 13.2.2012 13:14, Paolo Scarabelli napsal(a): > >> Hi Jirka, >> >> Since I participated to NetCAT 7.1 all the bugs I report using NetBeans >> Exception Reporter are prefixed with [cat71]. >> >> Is there a way I can prevent it or it's supposed to be that way? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paolo |
|
Hi Tomas,
I haven't reported any new exception yet, as soon as I can confirm I'll let you know. Thanks, Paolo On 02/16/2012 06:09 PM, Tomas Danek wrote: > Hello, > is this still valid? still getting prefixed issues? fix for this is already in repo, but I'm not currently sure if is present on currently running instance (we were migrating server to another machine in different location last week). > > T. > > On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > >> Hello Paolo, >> >> yes, this was as designed. >> >> Tomasi, can you please tweak Exception Reporter not to auto prefix the reports? The privilege for NetCAT participants to file bugs directly to Bugzilla should be kept. Thanks! >> >> -Jirka >> >> Dne 13.2.2012 13:14, Paolo Scarabelli napsal(a): >> >>> Hi Jirka, >>> >>> Since I participated to NetCAT 7.1 all the bugs I report using NetBeans >>> Exception Reporter are prefixed with [cat71]. >>> >>> Is there a way I can prevent it or it's supposed to be that way? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Paolo > > > |
|
In reply to this post by Tomas Danek
Hi Tomas,
I just reported a bug from the exception reporter and I can confirm that my bugs are still prefixed with [71cat]: http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208579 Regards, Paolo. On 02/16/2012 06:09 PM, Tomas Danek wrote: > Hello, > is this still valid? still getting prefixed issues? fix for this is already in repo, but I'm not currently sure if is present on currently running instance (we were migrating server to another machine in different location last week). > > T. > > On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > >> Hello Paolo, >> >> yes, this was as designed. >> >> Tomasi, can you please tweak Exception Reporter not to auto prefix the reports? The privilege for NetCAT participants to file bugs directly to Bugzilla should be kept. Thanks! >> >> -Jirka >> >> Dne 13.2.2012 13:14, Paolo Scarabelli napsal(a): >> >>> Hi Jirka, >>> >>> Since I participated to NetCAT 7.1 all the bugs I report using NetBeans >>> Exception Reporter are prefixed with [cat71]. >>> >>> Is there a way I can prevent it or it's supposed to be that way? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Paolo > > > |
|
Hi Paolo,
thanks for info,I'll verify if fix is present on running instance on monday, as soon as I get access there. Regards T. On Feb 17, 2012, at 7:40 PM, Paolo Scarabelli wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > I just reported a bug from the exception reporter and I can confirm that > my bugs are still prefixed with [71cat]: > > http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208579 > > Regards, > > Paolo. > > > > On 02/16/2012 06:09 PM, Tomas Danek wrote: >> Hello, >> is this still valid? still getting prefixed issues? fix for this is already in repo, but I'm not currently sure if is present on currently running instance (we were migrating server to another machine in different location last week). >> >> T. >> >> On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: >> >>> Hello Paolo, >>> >>> yes, this was as designed. >>> >>> Tomasi, can you please tweak Exception Reporter not to auto prefix the reports? The privilege for NetCAT participants to file bugs directly to Bugzilla should be kept. Thanks! >>> >>> -Jirka >>> >>> Dne 13.2.2012 13:14, Paolo Scarabelli napsal(a): >>> >>>> Hi Jirka, >>>> >>>> Since I participated to NetCAT 7.1 all the bugs I report using NetBeans >>>> Exception Reporter are prefixed with [cat71]. >>>> >>>> Is there a way I can prevent it or it's supposed to be that way? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Paolo >> >> >> |
|
Hi Paolo,
fix should be deployed to running instance. Regards T. On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Tomas Musil wrote: > Hi Paolo, > thanks for info,I'll verify if fix is present on running instance on monday, as soon as I get access there. > > Regards > > T. > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 7:40 PM, Paolo Scarabelli wrote: > >> Hi Tomas, >> >> I just reported a bug from the exception reporter and I can confirm that >> my bugs are still prefixed with [71cat]: >> >> http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208579 >> >> Regards, >> >> Paolo. >> >> >> >> On 02/16/2012 06:09 PM, Tomas Danek wrote: >>> Hello, >>> is this still valid? still getting prefixed issues? fix for this is already in repo, but I'm not currently sure if is present on currently running instance (we were migrating server to another machine in different location last week). >>> >>> T. >>> >>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Paolo, >>>> >>>> yes, this was as designed. >>>> >>>> Tomasi, can you please tweak Exception Reporter not to auto prefix the reports? The privilege for NetCAT participants to file bugs directly to Bugzilla should be kept. Thanks! >>>> >>>> -Jirka >>>> >>>> Dne 13.2.2012 13:14, Paolo Scarabelli napsal(a): >>>> >>>>> Hi Jirka, >>>>> >>>>> Since I participated to NetCAT 7.1 all the bugs I report using NetBeans >>>>> Exception Reporter are prefixed with [cat71]. >>>>> >>>>> Is there a way I can prevent it or it's supposed to be that way? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Paolo >>> >>> >>> > |
|
Thank you Tomas,
Now my bug reports are not marked as CAT71. Have a nice day, Paolo On 02/22/2012 08:02 PM, Tomas Danek wrote: > Hi Paolo, > fix should be deployed to running instance. > Regards > > T. > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Tomas Musil wrote: > >> Hi Paolo, >> thanks for info,I'll verify if fix is present on running instance on monday, as soon as I get access there. >> >> Regards >> >> T. >> >> On Feb 17, 2012, at 7:40 PM, Paolo Scarabelli wrote: >> >>> Hi Tomas, >>> >>> I just reported a bug from the exception reporter and I can confirm that >>> my bugs are still prefixed with [71cat]: >>> >>> http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208579 >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Paolo. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 02/16/2012 06:09 PM, Tomas Danek wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> is this still valid? still getting prefixed issues? fix for this is already in repo, but I'm not currently sure if is present on currently running instance (we were migrating server to another machine in different location last week). >>>> >>>> T. >>>> >>>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Paolo, >>>>> >>>>> yes, this was as designed. >>>>> >>>>> Tomasi, can you please tweak Exception Reporter not to auto prefix the reports? The privilege for NetCAT participants to file bugs directly to Bugzilla should be kept. Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> -Jirka >>>>> >>>>> Dne 13.2.2012 13:14, Paolo Scarabelli napsal(a): >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Jirka, >>>>>> >>>>>> Since I participated to NetCAT 7.1 all the bugs I report using NetBeans >>>>>> Exception Reporter are prefixed with [cat71]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a way I can prevent it or it's supposed to be that way? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Paolo >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > > > |
| Powered by Nabble | See how NAML generates this page |
